The PhoneBoy Blog » computers

Living Mobile and the Post-PC Era

PhoneBoy — Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:10:37 +0000

I’m just going to come right out and say it: most of my personal computing is done on a mobile device. A mobile device being a tablet or a phone either with WiFi or some kind of mobile Internet connection. This is despite being surrounded by more conventional laptop and desktop computers. Note this does not count my work-related use of computers, which, unfortunately, is still tied to a more conventional laptop.

It’s hard to know when the tipping point happened for me. Likely when I started getting more capable smartphones from Nokia, whom employed me at the time. Surely I had experienced the various Communicator-style devices (I had a 9210, a 9300, and a 9500). However, the two most pivotal devices for me: The Nokia E70 and the Nokia N95, which is the middle of 2006. I still have (and occasionally even use) the Nokia N95, even though by today’s standards, it’s only marginally more functional than a featurephone.

Of course in those days, Smartphones were not entirely accesible to the masses. Sure, they were obtainable in the sense you could go to any operator and buy one. But then what? Most people had no clue how to use them. Why else do you think the US operators had no problem selling unlimited data packages? Because no one was really using them (except for a few of us).

Then something changed: the iPhone came on the scene. While the first iteration of the iPhone OS (now called iOS) was arguably less functional than smartphones of the day, it quickly became the smartphone that everyone in the developed world wanted. It raised the bar for what the user experience should be on a phone.

Then Google-backed Android came on the scene and, after a few iterations, became a credible alternative to the iPhone. Microsoft, being a bit late to the party, completely redoes their mobile operating system. Nokia’s Symbian, the long-time leader in the smarphone space, could not keep up with the level of innovation Google and Apple were cranking out and, eventually, Nokia announced their plans to sunset the operating system and go with Windows Mobile. RIM, maker of the Blackberry handsets, have also struggled to keep pace and have stagnated.

It’s pretty clear to most industry observers (and even lay-people) that Android and iOS are the dominant phone operating systems. But it’s more than that: it’s now mobile computing. The same popular smartphone operating systems are now available in a different form factor device: tablets. And, as a number of industry analysts are saying, tablets are the new personal computers.

Apple led the way again here by introducing the iPad, using the same OS used on the insanely popular iPhone. A number of other hardware manufacturers have tried (and failed) to duplicate the success that Apple has had with the iPad using Android. The only manufacturer having any success is Amazon, who introduced the Kindle Fire at the end of 2011. Even their numbers are anemic compared to what Apple sells, but they have something the other tablet makers don’t have: a thriving ecosystem on which to use the device. Remember, Amazon sells all kinds of digital goods in much the same way Apple sells them through iTunes and the App Store.

Why do people prefer to use mobile devices rather than traditional computers? For me, it’s always been: because the device is always with me and connects me to what matters most. Even if it’s not a full experience, it’s often good enough.

For other people, it’s that these mobile devices are easier to use than traditional PCs. This is partially due to the easier-to-use touch interfaces on the current generation smartphones and tablets. There is also less for the average person to “screw up” as well, making for a less intimidating experience.

For another class of people, it’s because they can’t afford the PC and everything it takes to make it operate. This is certainly true in less affluent nations, such as Nigeria.

I had an interesting conversation over Twitter with Yomi Adegboye AKA Mister Mobility (he’s well worth following at @Mister_Mobility). It confirmed this hypothesis. Of course, during the 10 years I worked at Nokia, I took every opportunity to read up on everything Nokia was doing, including how they were developing phones for places like India and Africa. My hypothesis was already well informed.

In these less affluent nations, many people don’t even have electricity. Or if they do, it is supplied by a generator of some sort. Wired phone service may or may not exist (if it does, it is surely expensive for voice service, much less data service). The infrastructure needed to operate a PC may be entirely out of reach.

Meanwhile, while even a basic mobile phone is out of reach for some, that, a SIM card, and an occasional source of power is all one needs to compute and stay connected. For these folks, their mobile phone is their only computing device. Not because they prefer it, but because that’s what they are able to obtain.

There is no doubt in my mind that computing is going mobile. Will more traditional computers go away? While I expect my children won’t even need to own a traditional computer when they are young adults, the traditional computer will likely never go away entirely.

There is always going to be a need for bigger screens and more horsepower than you can pack into a device that lives in your pocket. Especially by people who generate large amounts of content. Will that be the norm for the average person, however? No.

Comments

4 February 2012, Facebook writes: [...] you're on the real Facebook web site. Also be sure to only download software from sites you trust.http://phoneboy.com/4251/living-mobile-and-the-post-pc-era?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed...ContinueGo back to [...]

This work originally came from The PhoneBoy Blog and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.
Fingerprint: e37ac627f3d973694c212ff9430d215a

Accell UltraAV USB 2.0 to HDMI Video and Audio Adapter

PhoneBoy — Sun, 11 Dec 2011 01:05:29 +0000

Every laptop comes with some method for hooking up to a computer monitor. On PC laptops, it’s a VGA connector. On Macs, it’s whatever version of DisplayPort Apple is using these days. Some might have HDMI ports–heck, phones and tablets certainly do.

Getting a computer hooked up to a modern TV is not nearly the ordeal it used to be. My Visio has a VGA plug on it, making it really easy to hook up to any computer. So one wonder why you might need a device like the UltraAV USB 2.0 to HDMI Adapter from Accell?

The problem with VGA: it’s an analog connection which means you can’t play back any videos with DRM. Also the video may not be as crisp and clear as you might get with a digital connection. You also would need a separate connection for audio. You might also not have a TV with VGA. Or, if you have one of those really thin laptops, no video output ports at all!
This USB 2.0 adapter solves that problem. Every modern computer has at least one USB port (whether it’s free or not is, admittedly, another matter). The device will work with any PC or Mac and includes a driver disc. Unfortunately, my PC laptop has no optical drive, so I opted for downloading them from the provided URL–interestingly not Accell’s site.

I tested the adapter, which was provided to me as part of this review, using a Lenovo X201 laptop and my 40″ Visio TV. Once I loaded the drivers and plugged in the adapter into my laptop, my big screen was now a monitor that Windows could mirror or extend my desktop to. I played a few videos to test the adapter and everything worked as expected.

You can get a UltraAV USB 2.0 to HDMI Adapter from Amazon or other places for $99.99.

Comments

10 December 2011, Accell UltraAV USB 2.0 to HDMI Video and Audio Adapter | Vga Port writes: [...] more: Accell UltraAV USB 2.0 to HDMI Video and Audio Adapter Uncategorizedapple, computer-hooked, display, hdmi, laptop-comes, vga, whatever-version [...]
10 December 2011, You've been Stumbled! writes: [...] You've been Stumbled! [...]

Cases, Cases

PhoneBoy — Fri, 25 Mar 2011 18:12:17 +0000

I received a MacBook sleeve and a iPhone 4 keyboard to review. They are both essentially cases. Let me explain.

The MacBook sleeve, in this case, is a 17″ SeeThru Satin case made by Speck that GearZap sent me. It’s black and covers my mid-2009 era MacBook Pro quite nicely. It feels good, is “see thru” in the sense that the glowing Apple shows through on the top and the blinking power light. I haven’t battle-tested it with a trip anywhere, but I suspect it will hold up quite nicely.

Meanwhile, I also got a TypeTop Swivel Mini Keyboard for iPhone4 from Mobile Fun. The tiny keyboard, about as thin as an iPod Touch and as big around as an iPhone 4, comes in a case that can carry both the iPhone and the keyboard together. The case can swivel around so that it looks almost like a mini laptop!

Unfortunately, I still don’t have an iPhone 4, so I cannot try this case as was intended. However, I can say the keyboard paired nicely with my iPhone 3GS. The lack of instructions on how to pair the keyboard was annoying, but it didn’t take long to figure out. Just a little tiny button at the top of the keyboard by the blue light.

Even without the case, the keyboard, which can be easily removed from the case, is small enough that it could easily go in my travel bag. It charges with an included MicroUSB cable.

The Cisco Valet: Easy Setup, but is it Secure?

PhoneBoy — Sat, 29 Jan 2011 19:46:08 +0000

A PR firm representing Cisco asked me if I wanted to review the Cisco Valet, which is a line of “surprisingly simply home wireless” devices that, I have to say, does what it says on the tin. It is by far the easiest setup process I’ve seen.

The first thing I noticed was the packaging. A complete lack of technical jargon or marketing about how this router compares to the others they sell. There most technical things on the box are in small print and are just basically a list of system requirements and a warning that, due to a number of factors, your wireless speeds and range may vary.

When I did the initial setup, I used my Mac–usually a stumbling block for these so-called “easy setup” programs. The Easy Set Up key is little more than a Flash drive that contains some documentation and the Cisco Connect application. Launching the Cisco Connect gives you a screen that tells you to do do three things:

Plug the router into your Internet connection
Plug the router into your power
Click next

In less than the five minutes it tells you it could take, I had a screen that told me my router was set up and I was connected to it. Sweet! You could, of course, do some additional configuration of the router. A very simple interface is presented for doing this (click image for larger view):

The add device option gives you the settings you need to configure a device. Obviously, it’s going to vary by device manufacturer. Once it has detected the device has connected, you can then “name” the device for later. Handy!

I didn’t mess with the parental controls–I almost never find them granular enough for my tastes. However, it appears they do some category-based URL filtering and allow you to blacklist sites. The problem is the restrictions are per-host, meaning you have to select the individual hosts that you wish to restrict. You also can’t whitelist sites or create a default URL filtering policy that applies to all connected hosts. That said, it’s more functionality than I’ve seen in a typical consumer router.

The guest access feature is quite handy as well. Cisco Valet creates a second (open) SSID that your guests can use to access the Internet. It is segmented off from your regular wireless network and presents a captive portal to your guests, whom must enter a password before they are allowed access to the Internet:

Of course, you can disable this feature as well.

When the router is first configured, the SSID is set to a random adjective-noun word combination and the password is set to a 10 character random string. In the Valet Settings, you can change these things to something. You can also save this to the Easy Setup Key (or create a new one using any standard USB thumb drive) that will allow you easily configure other Mac or Windows computers in your house with the correct wireless settings.

And, of course, there’s the Advanced Settings, which fires up a web browser with a typical Linksys-style web interface for configuring the router (though it is entirely Cisco-branded now). This is where the geek settings are, of course, and are, “advanced.” I’m sure given the relatively ease through which computers can be added and the basic settings can be configured, there will rarely be a reason for most people to ever visit the advanced settings.

But Is It Secure?

Most reviews stop here. They are quite happy that someone has finally come up with a wireless router that almost anyone with even rudimentary computer knowledge could configure and use. That is a feat worthy of praise, no doubt.

I am not most people. I wonder, in the back of my mind, does Cisco make this device easy to use, yet actually make it secure? The answer is not surprising–to me at least.

First, it’s probably worth pointing out that I work for a competitor to Cisco: Check Point Software Technologies. We don’t compete in the consumer market, really, but we certainly in the enterprise network security market. That doesn’t affect my opinions here, but I figure I should disclose that since some might consider it a conflict of interest.

Prior to proceeding with the setup wizard, I saw what the router was broadcasting by default–a WPA-protected access point named CiscoXXXXX (where XXXXX corresponded to the last 5 digits of the device serial number). My guess is the router is preconfigured with some default WPA password that the Cisco Connect software then changes to something else, which it then tells you after the setup is complete.

Cisco gets props on a number of things security related:

Choosing a random network name (SSID)–most manufacturers use a known default
Configuring WPA as a default
Choosing a random password that contains numbers, upper and lower case letters, and special symbols

All three of these things are good. By choosing a random SSID and a random password, it makes it harder for someone to brute-force (i.e. guess every possible password) access to the wireless access point.

While these are far better than what I’ve seen from others, it’s, unfortunately, not enough. To be relatively safe from a brute-force attempt, the passphrase needs to be at least 20 characters–random ones at that. Also, it defaults to WPA/WPA2 mixed mode, which allows you to use the TKIP, which may be needed for some legacy hardware, is not the most secure. You can change to WPA2, which only supports AES. It would be nice if you could change the rekey interval, but I don’t see a way to do that from the advanced settings.

There are a couple of other dangerous settings enabled by default:

Universal Plug and Play is enabled by default (which, when paired with malware, could easily make your computers more vulnerable to attacks)
WMM Support (in the QoS section) which, when enabled, makes your network a little more susceptible to hacking when WPA (not WPA2) is enabled.

The Nintendo DS Factor

One rather common WiFi-enabled device in any household with children is the Nintendo DS. This device does not support WPA at all. Even the newer DSi, which does support WPA, doesn’t support it for DS games. This means, if you want your kids to be able to use the WiFi features of their DS games, they won’t be able to use them unless you use WEP for your wireless security, which is not recommended.

This is, in my opinion, one big disappointment with the Cisco Valet. There is no way to allow a Nintendo DS to use the Guest wireless without using WEP. They could very easily allow the whitelisting of certain MAC addresses to be allowed to access the Guest wireless (which is open, unencrypted, and will work with the DS) without requiring web-based captive portal authentication.

Other Minor Gripes

The Cisco Connect software allows you to configure items that cannot be configured with the Advanced Settings interface, namely the Guest wireless access. I would like to be able to change the default IP range used for the Guest wireless and, possibly, whitelist certain machines as I described above.

By default, the router administration password the same as the WPA password. This does make it easier for end users, but I think you should be able to set them independently in the Cisco Connect software.

I also do not see a way through the Cisco Connect software to upgrade the firmware for my router. This is a necessary, sometimes daunting task, especially given the number of hardware variations that can exist even with the same model. There’s no reason Cisco couldn’t have made this process as simple as they’ve made everything else–push a button and it takes care of the rest.

And, of, course, my security gripes above. While they went a lot farther than I’ve seen other manufacturers go, they could have gone just a little farther in choosing more secure defaults, possibly with an optional “security settings” page so you don’t have to hunt in the Advanced Settings interface to make the wireless connectivity more secure.

All in all, though, I am very impressed with the product. I could easily see myself recommending this product to my non-technical friends and family as a dirt simple way to share their Internet connection and create their own personal wireless hotspot.

The only people I cannot recommend this product to are Linux users who lack a Windows or Mac machine on which to run the Cisco Connect software. Since the initial setup of this router cannot happen without the Cisco Connect software, which does not run on Linux, your “out of the box” experience will be less than fulfilling. You only need the software the first time, of course, but you might be better off with a Linksys-branded router.

So yes, Cisco did it. They made WiFi easy for normal people to set up. Using the Easy Setup Key, I set up four different Windows computers with my Cisco Valet settings in a matter of minutes. It was drop-dead simple. I wish they spent a little more time on the security side of things, but this is a tough one to do without making things more inconvenient for users. Given what Cisco was aiming for here, I think they nailed it.

Comments

13 February 2011, The Cisco Valet: Easy Setup, but is it Secure? - Wireless Network News writes: [...] Cisco Valet: Easy Setup, but is it Secure? The PhoneBoy Blog / 29th Jan 2011 Nintendo [...]

Speaking IPv6

PhoneBoy — Sat, 29 Jan 2011 06:03:52 +0000

IPv6 is the next generation of IP–the protocol by which most of our computers, phones, and other related devices talk to each other and to the Internet. Today, everything generally talks using IPv4, which has a 32-bit address space, or roughly 4 billion possible addresses. Both because of the sheer number of devices and the number of “reserved” addresses within the IPv4 space, the number of globally available IP addresses is running out.

To put it in perspective, as I write this, there is still a few /8 addresses unallocated by the IANA, which are distributed to regional registries, which are then responsible for distributing the IPs to ISPs, whom in turn distribute them to you. A /8, in IPv4, is 16,777,216 IP addresses. That seems like a lot of addresses, until you realize that, depending on how those IPs are allocated, the number of usable IPs ends up being a bit less.

Even so, once IANA runs out of /8s, the individual registries and ISPs still likely have caches of IPv4 addresses. The problem of address space exhaustion probably won’t show any acute symptoms immediately, but the lack of IPv4 addresses (and the lack of wide deployment of IPv6) will start causing problems soon, creating pockets of servers that can only be accessed by one protocol or another.

We’ve actually been working around the problem of address exhaustion in the IPv4 space for some time now using network address translation. That router you get from your local consumer electronics store has been masquerading all of your computers behind a single, public IP address, providing you both a level of protection and connectivity.

Enterprises do much the same thing, except their boxes are significantly larger and they also might provide services accessible on the Internet, which means: they need more than one public IP. Also, some enterprises have so many connected systems that they have, quite literally, run out of available private IP addresses (some IPs in the IPv4 space are set aside explicitly for private, non-Internet connected use).

In any case, the pressure is mounting to switch to IPv6. Given that some of my customers are asking about IPv6, I figured I’d get myself educated. I happen to have access to one of the people who helped define the IPv6 standards in the IETF (he works at Check Point), but there’s really no better way to learn about it than to just get it set up.

Of course, part of the problem right now is that my ISPs at home (Comcast, CenturyLink) are still serving me IPv4 addresses. Fortunately, there are ways of tunneling over IPv4 to the IPv6 networks. One such service is TunnelBroker, run by the folks at Hurricane Electric. They tunnel IPv6 packets inside of IPv4 packets (more specifically using IP Protocol 41, designed for this purpose).

I had it working on an old Linksys router I had flashed with TomatoUSB and hacked a bit. I had IPv6 flowing through my network and was able to reach a few sites over IPv6. Then I had the realization that I was no longer protected by my router. I was now directly reachable–without a firewall! While I could fix that, I think that’s enough experimentation for now.

I guess the point is: I can make it work today. However, few people are going to want to do what I had to go through to make it work. Every hop in the network has to be IPv6 friendly and IPv6 enabled. For the home user, it’s going to have to be as simple as plugging in a router. We’ll get there, but it’s going to be a bumpy ride for the next few years.

Comments

20 February 2011, A. T. writes: when I noticed Hurricane Electric mentioned, immediately I recalled "Running IPv6 in practice" http://www.debian-administration.org/article/Running_IPv6_in_practice ... could be great if you tag all your IPv6 posts with particular tag ;)
20 February 2011, PhoneBoy writes: I was thinking about doing that anyway, thanks for reminding me!

This Incident Will be Reported

PhoneBoy — Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:41:53 +0000

Via xkcd: Incident

Power PC Ubuntu Mini (Formerly Mac Mini)

PhoneBoy — Sun, 05 Dec 2010 08:17:35 +0000

I finally made my old Power PC-based Mac Mini useful. I installed the latest fUbuntu release on it, which even though the makers of Ubuntu don’t officially support, works reasonably well.

Of course, you get a lot less “non free” software since Power PC on Linux is even more of a bastard stepchild than Linux on Intel. I also have to give up Google Chrome/Chromium since it only runs on Intel or ARM hardware.

Even so Ubuntu seems a lot more snappy than OS X Tiger seemed to be.

Should I Use This Computer?

PhoneBoy — Wed, 03 Nov 2010 22:57:36 +0000

Found at a hotel “business center” computer.

The TRS-80 Pocket Computer!

PhoneBoy — Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:31:29 +0000

From Ira Goldklang’s TRS-80 Revived Site » TRS-80 Computers: TRS-80 Pocket Computers:

Radio Shack puts big computing power in the palm of your hand with the amazing new TRS-80 Pocket Computer, the first complete, portable copmuting system you can program in BASIC. The Pocket Computer can solve problems, process data, assist with decision-making, teach, and even entertain – at a low price that seems all the more incredible once you’ve explored its exiting features

This “pocket computer” came out in 1980. They were little more than glorified calculators, but you could program them with BASIC. Tandy (Radio Shack) actually put out a number of variants of this during the 1980s with different form factors (and costs).

The modern day equivalent of the TRS-80 Pocket Computer is, of course, your smartphone. Whether it’s an iPhone, Android, Nokia, Blackberry, or something else, it’s going to look just as quaint in 30 years as these TRS-80 Pocket Computers do today.

Comments

29 October 2010, Myrcurial writes: I wanted one of those so bad (or the one from Casio or Sharp) back then. I ended up with an HP95LX that got me through college intact. These kids today have no idea how hard we had it -- monochrome, text only, external 9600bps modems...
29 October 2010, tom writes: i was just thinking about my early computers: VIC-20, atari 400, cassette tape for storage. a really big deal was when i got a 300 baud acoustic coupler modem. but when i look back at it i also miss those days. computers were really something special than. it was somehow a lot more fun being a geek in those days. than the early internet came and it was a meeting place for a special kind of person. it was not about advertising, there were no business models. it was all about knowledge. i would probably happily give up HTML and the whole multimedia internet if it meant the old community of 20 years ago would come back. i know its selfish but i do often feel this way.
29 October 2010, PhoneBoy writes: tom, I think I have to agree with you. It was a very real "community," especially if you used a local BBS or three (even ran one for a while). Everything happened at a very different pace in those days.
30 October 2010, tom writes: i did use local BBS's(sometimes called RCP/M's) which became networked through fidonet and also at times had permission to access large mainframes at universities which had there own community built around their messaging systems. it was all about knowledge and helping each other. it was definitely not about 'money' as so much of the modern internet and tech industry in general is toady.

Why The iPhone Doesn’t Multitask

PhoneBoy — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 09:11:47 +0000

I’ve had my iPhone 3GS for a few days now. It is turning out to be everything I expected. Perhaps because I did my homework before buying. I went into it with my eyes wideopen.

One thing I knew going into buying this handset was that the iPhone’s ability to multitask was mostly non-existent. The iPod function would play music in the background, Microsoft Exchange syncing would occur in the background. Built-in apps (and some third party apps) would appear to resume where they left off.

There are times where the ability to multitask would be useful. Streaming music over 3G with one app and using Trapster to look for known speed traps is one (FYI, the new release that’s compatible with 3.0 is HOT). Using something like a chat client and “some other app” is another. I’m sure you can name about a gajillion others.

We often treat our smart phones like computers. They are, in a sense, but they aren’t nearly as full powered as your desktop or laptop computer is. Consider that my personal computer is a first generation MacBook with 2 gigs of RAM and an external screen attached. Surely I can run–and see–a number of apps at once. It also has the benefit of a hard drive that allows me to use virtual memory to run more apps.

Meanwhile, the iPhone 3GS supposedly has 256mb of RAM. One of my first work laptops I had at Nokia had that much RAM. But unlike that laptop, the iPhone 3GS doesn’t have a hard drive for using virtual memory. Sure, you could use the flash memory for this purpose, but do you want to wear out the flash in your phone that much faster?

The Nokia E71 has only half the RAM of the iPhone: 128mb! Yes, it multitasks. I can tell you that phone starts bogging down when more than a couple of applications are running on it at the same time. The phone crashes or freezes and needs to be power cycled. Regularly.

While there are plenty of perfectly valid reasons to multitask, our mobile platforms today don’t have enough RAM–or CPU–for the task. Apple, having a singular focus on an excellent user experience, decided not to allow third party apps to run in the background. By focusing most of the memory and CPU on only one primary task–and a controlled set of others–Apple ensures your iPhone experience will be smooth. That isn’t to say your phone won’t crash, but it happens much less frequently.

And you know what? I think it’s a lack of multitasking is an acceptable tradeoff. My phone is more reliable. It doesn’t randomly freeze. It does what I’m asking it to do when I ask it to do it. It’s the way most people expect their phone to behave. Apple will support multitasking when our mobile platforms have a bit more memory, CPU horsepower, and, of course, better battery life.

Comments

13 July 2009, Jeremey writes: Agreed, and I don't think people have fully grasped the push notification model or the power available there.
13 July 2009, David Beckemeyer writes: I'd be okay if they never open up multiasking as a free-for-all. I'm okay with those apps that want to mutitask to require an extra fee and extra testing and certification for exactly the reasons you state. Franky, people have forgotten how to program for relibability, for pacemaker type reliability. We don' thave to. The OS recovers all our leaked memory for us when we restart the app, and computes have so much memory etc that poor practices can operate in real life without much trouble. As you note, not so on a smaller machine, where memory, CPU, and battery power consumption matter. I've written apps for Nokia that run in the background reliably for months on end, don't consume all the memory, or burn up the battery, etc. But you have to REALLY work at it and have all those things at the forefront of the design and implementation - and that's not the way most people write apps. Most people don't even know enough about the guts of the machine to know how to write that kind of code.
13 July 2009, PhoneBoy writes: You're right, David. Nobody does the work to develop apps--mobile or otherwise--that are CPU, memory, and power efficient. Heck, even the OS vendors can't get this right (yes, I'm looking at you, Microsoft and Nokia).
13 July 2009, Andy Abramson writes: Trapster and push notification would be very, very cool.
13 July 2009, PhoneBoy writes: It does today, it just only gives you new traps reported within a 30 mile radius (give or take). If it could do push based on your GPS location, that would be hot :)
14 July 2009, gerrymoth writes: Today I've been using my Nokia 5800XM to listen to podcasts, tweet on Gravity, check email using Profimail and read greader using opera mini, while caling and texting now and then, ALL at the same time with no Crashes, Shutdowns or slowdown. Yes Nokia's can multitask, with the right phone and the right apps.
14 July 2009, PhoneBoy writes: The 5800XM has other issues, too: a poor touch-screen keyboard and abysmal battery life. There's a reason I have *four* batteries for this phone. :)

One Icon To Rule Them All

PhoneBoy — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:06:39 +0000

One of the things I will not miss about working for Nokia is all of the crap that the IT department loads on the company laptops. Aside from all the end-user apps, there were different programs for:

Firewall (it wasn’t the Windows firewall, either)
VPN
Anti-virus
Hard drive encryption

Needless to say, these programs (and many others) bogged down my laptop, making it slow.

When I got my Check Point laptop (or rather a hard drive from Check Point for my existing laptop), I was surprised to find all this functionality and a whole lot more in Check Point’s Endpoint Security client. A single icon in mytask bar shows me:

Firewall
VPN
Antivirus
Antispyware
Program Control (ability to restrict certain apps from running)
Full Disk and Media Encryption

The client is fairly unobtrustive and does its thing without too much hassle, aside from the occasional request for VPN authentication. My taskbar has many less icons than it did before. The machine is also significantly faster than it was with my Nokia image. All in all, I am very happy with this change!

I’m looking forward to learning more about Check Point’s Endpoint Security offerings, both on the enterprise side as well as on the consumer side (under the ZoneAlarm brand). I think there’s a compelling story there.

Comments

22 April 2009, UPrinting Sales writes: I had the same experience with my previous job. I mostly get annoyed at all the add-ons that company issued laptops have, like the ones you mentioned above, sometimes even more. It slows down the laptop considerably! Will look forward to your review on the consumer side security offerings. Thanks!

TV Online: So Simple, A Four Year Old Can Do It

PhoneBoy — Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:39:23 +0000

I was watching my 4 year old watch Pokemon on the computer the other day (pictured here, playing Racquetball), when I had a rather startiling realization: she can figure out how to get the computer to show what she wants, yet can’t operate the televison.

Our televisions at home are relatively simple 19 inch ones from 1991 that cost about $300. They still work good, but the buttons are falling off and we’ve long since lost or replaced the original remotes with universal ones. They are not particularly hard to operate, but that assumes you can read, which my daughter can’t do yet.

Every time I go to someone’s house and attempt to use their TV, I feel like I need to take lessons in how to watch TV. Even with a Universal remote, it still a rather confusing series of steps just to get a picture on the screen. Heaven help you if you want to watch a DVD.

In addition to our old TVs, we opt for cable that came from the 1970s: (mostly) broadcast channels only. The kids can watch PBS and we can watch the few network shows. No Nickelodeon or Disney Channel to infect my brats with High School Musical. The total cost: $15/mo, which is about what I value televison at. It is most certainly not the $100+ a month the cable companies charge for access to all channels in HD.

Even if I had all the channels, who is to say what’s on when you want to watch? Yes, I know you can get on-demand or a Tivo, but that just adds extra cost to something I already consider to be of marginal value anyway. Not to mention the added complexity of owning one of these devices and integrating it into your home audio/video system.

Meanwhile, watching what you want, when you want, is so simple a four year old can figure out how to do it. It’s legal, it doesn’t require complicated TV setups or cost any extra money, beyond the Internet connection I am already paying for. What’s not to like?

KeyRight Keyboard: Colorful, Educational

PhoneBoy — Wed, 19 Nov 2008 07:15:00 +0000

I think my kids might like this just for the colors. However, this keyboard from KeyRight isn’t colorful “just because.” The colors tell you what keys your different fingers should hit for the most optimal typing experience and supposedly are 192% more effective than without the colors.

The keyboard along with the included typing tutor program is supposed to increase your typing speeds in as little as 6 hours. PC or Mac compatible. For people who aren’t touch typists and want to be, $39.99 is a small price to pay.

Das Keyboard: Solid and Clicky

PhoneBoy — Mon, 11 Aug 2008 07:01:39 +0000

I tend to be a cheap keyboard guy. I find whatever I can get my hands on for the lowest possible price. Unfortunately, some of the keyboards I’ve bought this way have been real crappy ones in the long run.

Das Keyboard sent me a review unit to try out. I was expecting a “clicky” keyboard, as that’s what their promotional materials promised. Sure enough, it’s clicky.

I’m sure many long-time geeks like myself will remember the first truly clicky keyboard–the original IBM AT keyboard. It was solid and clicked like mad whenever you typed on it. This keyboard is almost like that. Sure, it clicks, but the click isn’t entirely the same, nor do the keys feel as solid as that original.

That being said, this is a very solid keyboard. It weighs at least twice what my other keyboards weigh, and even better, it functions as a two-port USB 2.0 hub. I also like the color.

The Das Keyboard comes in another model–one without markings on the keys. It’s designed to help you learn how to touch-type.

My only misgiving with the keyboard is the price: $129 seems steep for a keyboard. Of course, this comes from someone happy to buy keyboards for a buck a piece from Woot. However, this is one of the best keyboards I’ve used in a long time. It’d be a no-brainer at half the price.

WTR45GS Finally Has Useful Firmware

PhoneBoy — Sat, 02 Aug 2008 07:01:28 +0000

A while ago, I had purchased a Linksys WTR54GS as a travel companion. Not to be confused with the legendary WRT54GS, which is a desktop router, it is a fairly serviceable router that slides into a nice little compact carrying case complete with an Ethernet cable to jack in a computer or to something else.

The main problem I had with the WTR54GS? The firmware. Linksys never bothered to update beyond the initial shipping version, and the firmware is crap. The router’s web interface was slow and frequently experienced weird glitches. A problem with nearly every Linksys router since they switched to using VxWorks instead of Linux.

The folks behind DD-WRT figured out how to liberate this device from a life of running VxWorks. I followed the rather convoluted steps for getting DD-WRT onto the router. One small hitch I ran into was that the referenced Sercomm utility crashes under XP. However, a quick Google search resulted in finding an update to Sercomm that would make it run under XP.

After about 10 minutes, the WTR54GS was running DD-WRT. The web interface worked and was nice and peppy. All the functionality of DD-WRT is now in my travel bag, ready to convert WiFi to Ethernet or vice-versa.

Now if only Linksys would drop this VxWorks crap, their current routers might not suck so bad.

The PhoneBoy Blog » computers

Living Mobile and the Post-PC Era

Comments

Related Posts

Accell UltraAV USB 2.0 to HDMI Video and Audio Adapter

Comments

Related Posts

Cases, Cases

Related Posts

The Cisco Valet: Easy Setup, but is it Secure?

Comments

Related Posts

Speaking IPv6

Comments

Related Posts

This Incident Will be Reported

Related Posts

Power PC Ubuntu Mini (Formerly Mac Mini)

Related Posts

Should I Use This Computer?

Related Posts

The TRS-80 Pocket Computer!

Comments

Related Posts

Why The iPhone Doesn’t Multitask

Comments

Related Posts

One Icon To Rule Them All

Comments

Related Posts

TV Online: So Simple, A Four Year Old Can Do It

Related Posts

KeyRight Keyboard: Colorful, Educational

Related Posts

Das Keyboard: Solid and Clicky

Related Posts

WTR45GS Finally Has Useful Firmware

Related Posts

The PhoneBoy Blog » computers

Living Mobile and the Post-PC Era

Comments

Related Posts

Accell UltraAV USB 2.0 to HDMI Video and Audio Adapter

Comments

Related Posts

Cases, Cases

Related Posts

The Cisco Valet: Easy Setup, but is it Secure?

Comments

Related Posts

Speaking IPv6

Comments

Related Posts

This Incident Will be Reported

Related Posts

Power PC Ubuntu Mini (Formerly Mac Mini)

Related Posts

Should I Use This Computer?

Related Posts

The TRS-80 Pocket Computer!

Comments

Related Posts

Why The iPhone Doesn’t Multitask

Comments

Related Posts

One Icon To Rule Them All

Comments

Related Posts

TV Online: So Simple, A Four Year Old Can Do It

Related Posts

KeyRight Keyboard: Colorful, Educational

Related articles by Zemanta

Related Posts

Das Keyboard: Solid and Clicky

Related Posts

WTR45GS Finally Has Useful Firmware

Related Posts