<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Complex, Multi-faceted Net Neutrality Debate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phoneboy.com/3220/the-complex-multi-faceted-net-neutrality-debate/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phoneboy.com/3220/the-complex-multi-faceted-net-neutrality-debate</link>
	<description>Simplifying Network Security, Telecom, Gadgets, and More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: tom</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/3220/the-complex-multi-faceted-net-neutrality-debate/comment-page-1#comment-27538</link>
		<dc:creator>tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phoneboy.com/?p=3220#comment-27538</guid>
		<description>years ago it used to be come to read articles that described a future where a radio transceiver would be located on every lamp post. now that the networks have becomes congested i no longer read about this option to increase capacity. 

first i really do appreciate the fastest possible network connection. but the rate being marketed by the wireless carriers are unrealistic. they need to look at the total demand picture. it may make quite a bit of sense to slow down the peak speeds of the data networks in order to serve the maximum number of customers. here in Denver cricket broadband is really become a popular option including as a wired replacement. the peak speed is around only 500 kbps. but the 5GB cap is a soft cap(they have the right to slow down your connection but no overage charges) and service while slow seems very consistent when compared to the major carrier network that always seem to slow down dramatically at certain times of the day. perhaps AT&amp;T instead of providing 7.2 mbps should offer around 1 mbps to 7 times as many customers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>years ago it used to be come to read articles that described a future where a radio transceiver would be located on every lamp post. now that the networks have becomes congested i no longer read about this option to increase capacity. </p>
<p>first i really do appreciate the fastest possible network connection. but the rate being marketed by the wireless carriers are unrealistic. they need to look at the total demand picture. it may make quite a bit of sense to slow down the peak speeds of the data networks in order to serve the maximum number of customers. here in Denver cricket broadband is really become a popular option including as a wired replacement. the peak speed is around only 500 kbps. but the 5GB cap is a soft cap(they have the right to slow down your connection but no overage charges) and service while slow seems very consistent when compared to the major carrier network that always seem to slow down dramatically at certain times of the day. perhaps AT&amp;T instead of providing 7.2 mbps should offer around 1 mbps to 7 times as many customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

