<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reducing Roadblocks For More Towers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://phoneboy.com/2573/reducing-roadblocks-for-more-towers/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://phoneboy.com/2573/reducing-roadblocks-for-more-towers</link>
	<description>Simplifying Network Security, Telecom, Gadgets, and More!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 00:36:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoneBoy</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/2573/reducing-roadblocks-for-more-towers/comment-page-1#comment-26898</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 07:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phoneboy.com/?p=2573#comment-26898</guid>
		<description>I think it makes sense to share towers where it is feasible, but it is only one part of the solution, you are right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it makes sense to share towers where it is feasible, but it is only one part of the solution, you are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Skype Blog auf Deutsch</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/2573/reducing-roadblocks-for-more-towers/comment-page-1#comment-26851</link>
		<dc:creator>Skype Blog auf Deutsch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 10:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phoneboy.com/?p=2573#comment-26851</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] Reducing Roadblocks For More Towers [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&lt;!&#8211;%kramer-ref-pre%&#8211;&gt;[...] Reducing Roadblocks For More Towers [...]&lt;!&#8211;%kramer-ref-post%&#8211;&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spg</title>
		<link>http://phoneboy.com/2573/reducing-roadblocks-for-more-towers/comment-page-1#comment-26850</link>
		<dc:creator>spg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 03:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://phoneboy.com/?p=2573#comment-26850</guid>
		<description>its a very complicated issue actually. there is alway the questions of whether a high rise towers is needed or if micro/pico cells placed within the area could do the job; but at a different cost. there are also many methods of using smart antennas that can cover large areas/subscriber numbers with fewer towers. we probably need all of these together with more towers and spectrum.

of course there is also the debate about carriers sharing towers. it lowers capitol cost that could potentially lower calling rates; but at the same time could result in a less competitive atmosphere that could have the opposite affect on rates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its a very complicated issue actually. there is alway the questions of whether a high rise towers is needed or if micro/pico cells placed within the area could do the job; but at a different cost. there are also many methods of using smart antennas that can cover large areas/subscriber numbers with fewer towers. we probably need all of these together with more towers and spectrum.</p>
<p>of course there is also the debate about carriers sharing towers. it lowers capitol cost that could potentially lower calling rates; but at the same time could result in a less competitive atmosphere that could have the opposite affect on rates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

