<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CTIA&#8217;s &#8220;Talking Points&#8221; Against Carterfone Rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules</link>
	<description>VoIP, Mobile Phones, Telecom, and Technology Made Simple</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 04:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: CTIA: We Love to Hate 'em but Still Love that Conference - WMExperts</title>
		<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25944</link>
		<dc:creator>CTIA: We Love to Hate 'em but Still Love that Conference - WMExperts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 18:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25944</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-ref-pre%--&gt;[...] doesn't think that the &#8220;Carterfone rules&#8221; shouldn't apply to wireless networks. These are the rules that state that any phone that doesn't break the network should be allowed, [...]&lt;!--%kramer-ref-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://dev.wp-plugins.org/wiki/Kramer" onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/dev.wp-plugins.org');"><img src="http://www.phoneboy.com/homepages/9/d107125887/htdocs/www.phoneboy.com/wp-content/plugins/kramer.php?kramer=gif-icon" class="technorati-balloon" alt="Kramer auto Pingback" style="border:0;" /></a>[...] doesn&#8217;t think that the &#8220;Carterfone rules&#8221; shouldn&#8217;t apply to wireless networks. These are the rules that state that any phone that doesn&#8217;t break the network should be allowed, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoneBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25658</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 01:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25658</guid>
		<description>@mikelt The USSR and mobile network operators: sounds like an appropriate analogy, especially in the Land Of The Free.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mikelt The USSR and mobile network operators: sounds like an appropriate analogy, especially in the Land Of The Free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikelt</title>
		<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25654</link>
		<dc:creator>mikelt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 16:14:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25654</guid>
		<description>If the early development of the Internet can be compared to the American Wild West, then the rise of the U.S. cellular industry can be likened to Stalin's Soviet Union. Carrier networks rule developers, device manufactures, and consumers with an iron fist, allowing only the services and features of their choice on their networks.
http://voip-facts.net/cell-net-neutrality.php</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the early development of the Internet can be compared to the American Wild West, then the rise of the U.S. cellular industry can be likened to Stalin&#8217;s Soviet Union. Carrier networks rule developers, device manufactures, and consumers with an iron fist, allowing only the services and features of their choice on their networks.<br />
<a href="http://voip-facts.net/cell-net-neutrality.php"  onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/voip-facts.net');">http://voip-facts.net/cell-net-neutrality.php</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhoneBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25318</link>
		<dc:creator>PhoneBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jan 2008 07:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25318</guid>
		<description>@spg Now you're getting into net neutrality rules, which I don't think Carterfone ever really addressed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@spg Now you&#8217;re getting into net neutrality rules, which I don&#8217;t think Carterfone ever really addressed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spg</title>
		<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25308</link>
		<dc:creator>spg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 21:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25308</guid>
		<description>when it comes to 'skype rules' i don't want the operators involved at all. i do not want them to block any packets or IP address'; but i do not want them in the VOIP business either. i want to load my own choice of VOIP service onto my handset and use it over a data link that i purchase from my operator. as long as they do not intentionally block anything i do not want their help since they are sure to charge something extra for allowing the privilege.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when it comes to &#8217;skype rules&#8217; i don&#8217;t want the operators involved at all. i do not want them to block any packets or IP address&#8217;; but i do not want them in the VOIP business either. i want to load my own choice of VOIP service onto my handset and use it over a data link that i purchase from my operator. as long as they do not intentionally block anything i do not want their help since they are sure to charge something extra for allowing the privilege.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claim Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CTIA’s “Talking Points” Against Carterfone Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25301</link>
		<dc:creator>Claim Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CTIA’s “Talking Points” Against Carterfone Rules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25301</guid>
		<description>[...] PhoneBoy wrote an interesting post today on CTIA&#226;s &#226;Talking Points&#226; Against Carterfone RulesHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUm, isn’t this why the FCC exists, to ensure handsets meet the specific standards they claim to support? The fact is, I use “unapproved” handsets on AT&#38;T and T-Mobile all the time–without issue. And their “support” claim? &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PhoneBoy wrote an interesting post today on CTIA&acirc;s &acirc;Talking Points&acirc; Against Carterfone RulesHere&#8217;s a quick excerptUm, isn’t this why the FCC exists, to ensure handsets meet the specific standards they claim to support? The fact is, I use “unapproved” handsets on AT&#38;T and T-Mobile all the time–without issue. And their “support” claim? &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CTIA’s “Talking Points” Against Carterfone Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25300</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; CTIA’s “Talking Points” Against Carterfone Rules</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 09:02:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25300</guid>
		<description>[...] PhoneBoy wrote an interesting post today on CTIA&#226;s &#226;Talking Points&#226; Against Carterfone RulesHere&#8217;s a quick excerptCTIA’s “Talking Points” Against Carterfone Rules; What’s Keeping US Mobile Phones in The Stone Age? Mobile Phones, Applications, and Subsidies; Nokia Applauds FCC Decision To Require Open Access in 700MHz Spectrum; Blog Tag And The &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PhoneBoy wrote an interesting post today on CTIA&acirc;s &acirc;Talking Points&acirc; Against Carterfone RulesHere&#8217;s a quick excerptCTIA’s “Talking Points” Against Carterfone Rules; What’s Keeping US Mobile Phones in The Stone Age? Mobile Phones, Applications, and Subsidies; Nokia Applauds FCC Decision To Require Open Access in 700MHz Spectrum; Blog Tag And The &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EQO Community &#124; Blogs and Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25492</link>
		<dc:creator>EQO Community &#124; Blogs and Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 1969 16:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.phoneboy.com/2052/ctias-talking-points-against-carterfone-rules#comment-25492</guid>
		<description>&lt;!--%kramer-pre%--&gt;travel further and penetrate obstructions better.  The owner of this spectrum could set up low cost, high service availability, and fast wireless network that could change the face of the American wireless industry, which is generally considered alaughing stockcompared to the rest of the modern wireless world.  The front runners to win this tasty bit of frequency are Verizon (evil) and Google (awesome).  Verizon would likely use the spectrum to buoy their own position in the USA by offering services only&lt;!--%kramer-post%--&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.technorati.com/cosmos/search.html?url="class="technorati-balloon"  onclick="javascript:urchinTracker ('/outbound/comment/www.technorati.com');"><img src="http://static.technorati.com/images/bubble_h17.gif" class="technorati-balloon" alt="links from Technorati" style="border:0;" /></a>travel further and penetrate obstructions better.  The owner of this spectrum could set up low cost, high service availability, and fast wireless network that could change the face of the American wireless industry, which is generally considered alaughing stockcompared to the rest of the modern wireless world.  The front runners to win this tasty bit of frequency are Verizon (evil) and Google (awesome).  Verizon would likely use the spectrum to buoy their own position in the USA by offering services only</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.391 seconds -->
